Latest Topics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Today at 7:20 pm
Meh.
#3 Re: Meh. on Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:34 pm
Insekz
Country: 
Posts: 3005
IQ: 2543
Join date: 2007-11-01
I would almost use that.
OVER 9000!!!!!!?
OVER 9000!!!!!!?
#4 Re: Meh. on Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:48 pm
Roachleader
Country: 
Posts: 1390
IQ: 1755
Join date: 2009-07-17
all i have to say is: GOOD JOB! sexeh work on dat siggeh!
#5 Re: Meh. on Wed Mar 10, 2010 2:49 pm
tool
Country:
Posts: 5903
IQ: 2666
Join date: 2008-10-16
lol Sketch, thanks.
#6 Re: Meh. on Tue May 25, 2010 12:22 pm
abuse
Hiho 
Definitely your best work by far.
Text is bad tho, the color/font might work, but not at the sides, put it somewhere near the middle of the sig, and you need a focal, more lighting on the render would solve that. Atm nothing really stands out of the sig.
Definitely your best work by far.
Text is bad tho, the color/font might work, but not at the sides, put it somewhere near the middle of the sig, and you need a focal, more lighting on the render would solve that. Atm nothing really stands out of the sig.
#7 Re: Meh. on Tue May 25, 2010 1:08 pm
Roachleader
Country:
Posts: 1390
IQ: 1755
Join date: 2009-07-17
abuse, not all people have the same style/taste.
but tool, that was a really good job.
but tool, that was a really good job.
#8 Re: Meh. on Wed May 26, 2010 6:56 pm
abuse
Roachleader wrote:abuse, not all people have the same style/taste.
but tool, that was a really good job.
what I said has nothing to do with style/taste.
That is basic knowledge that should be done in every single sig.
end of discussion.
Message [Page 1 of 1]
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum