http://era.noghost.net/html/files/nexus.dm3

plz read this

http://www.vm.namepad.net/viewtopic.php?t=1077

lol owned

so who is Hax0r?

Lol how sad...


@ rambo: The name says it all.

LOL HE just got back to q3
and he hacking


pfft.

good catch Comp that name sounds familiar. i someone named HaXor was playing yesterday in Dallas at roughly 7pm PST. his aiming was very suspicious and he asked all of us to demo him. switched names to eT-ziggeh i believe. might be worth checking out at least

.acid wrote:good catch Comp that name sounds familiar. i someone named HaXor was playing yesterday in Dallas at roughly 7pm PST. his aiming was very suspicious and he asked all of us to demo him. switched names to eT-ziggeh i believe. might be worth checking out at least

pssh, its o2o hax0r. ziggie, same person.

hes dropped numerous times, yet tries to come back. nice catch too by cynthia, good thing shes a recommended ref.
and nice comp. both nice job.

Rofls! Thanks again nucking. lolL.

NuckingFuts wrote:

.acid wrote:good catch Comp that name sounds familiar. i someone named HaXor was playing yesterday in Dallas at roughly 7pm PST. his aiming was very suspicious and he asked all of us to demo him. switched names to eT-ziggeh i believe. might be worth checking out at least

pssh, its o2o hax0r. ziggie, same person.

hes dropped numerous times, yet tries to come back. nice catch too by cynthia, good thing shes a recommended ref.
and nice comp. both nice job.

nuck, no offense, but you have to get your facts straight. He has dropped ONCE due to a cracked q3 exec which does not mean that he in fact hacked. It gives you the ability to hack or some people use it as an illegal version of q3.

I trust haxor in that he never hacked but that is my opinion.

Jesus, where have been your ass baby xD?
He get caught by Meva and already in one screenshot, didn't you know?

ziggeh = iskate from xG

mmm, this was only June 14 when he was trying for vM;;

http://www.vm.namepad.net/viewtopic.php?t=936&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

First SS he posted had a hack in it, and if you go to last page of topic, it is pointed out. He claims that he only used the hack because people were accusing him anyway. Even if that is the case, it is still a dumbass move in my opinion. If he didnt hack before, noone had solid proof, he just gave them exactly what they wanted. If he did hack before, than pwnt, he just got ownt.

jesus - nuck, no offense, but you have to get your facts straight. He has dropped ONCE due to a cracked q3 exec which does not mean that he in fact hacked. It gives you the ability to hack or some people use it as an illegal version of q3.

I trust haxor in that he never hacked but that is my opinion.

mmm, this was only June 14 when he was trying for vM;;

http://www.vm.namepad.net/viewtopic.php?t=936&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

First SS he posted had a hack in it, and if you go to last page of topic, it is pointed out. He claims that he only used the hack because people were accusing him anyway. Even if that is the case, it is still a dumbass move in my opinion. If he didnt hack before, noone had solid proof, he just gave them exactly what they wanted. If he did hack before, than pwnt, he just got ownt

but he never haxed.....

Lol, ...?
He was suspected, then posted and SS with, ummm, a health hack in it?
I dont see how that proves he hacked, unless that only comes up if you are hacking?

Rambo wrote:Lol, ...?
He was suspected, then posted and SS with, ummm, a health hack in it?
I dont see how that proves he hacked, unless that only comes up if you are hacking?

yeppers. its a part of a well known hax. and reg quake doesnt have it. i wont mention b/c u may go download it rambos. :P
kidding, but the ss is a hax.

Lmao, kk.

Sorry for my unawareness : )

Thanks for the link cynthia as I was not aware of that SS. That is indeed a hack. Sad, but true.

True, nucking, he dropped once as I said but he did not drop "numerous times" as you stated.

One persons opinion on a demo is not enough for me - that is why we use a jury . Some people didn't think he was hacking in that demo.

Anyway, it doesn't matter anymore. -1

I just ask all get your facts straight before you post . Surprised the SS hack that h4x posted was not discussed elsewhere since I didn't no vM had a site I never saw it and the fact that I hardly play anymore.

thanks all!

Your right its supposed to be a jury system.
This isnt the demo i pmed you about
Id like to note I didnt have a clue to who he was when i sent it to vm.

But I would like to point out that reck who has never droped nor posted a hack ss seems to have less rights than haxor does that seem fair?

I posted it in suspected so ppl could give there opinions on this demo.

hmm.... 93 in 10 min. don't need to even bother looking at the hack chat because thta score is proof enough

also good call comp. as i've said before in an earlier post, evaluate reck (and all other suspected cheaters) with an impartial eye. don't assume the menatilty of guilty until proven innocent. it should be the other way around

.acid wrote:hmm.... 93 in 10 min. don't need to even bother looking at the hack chat because thta score is proof enough

that's just plain ignorance bro - many "leet" players can run off 100 in 10 or better on a given day...means nothing in regards to whether or not a person automatically hacks